Working with
an internationally recognized mathematical psychologist, Dr. Gordon Bechtel, PMR has
developed a sharper and more advanced statistical measurement tool to evaluate customer satisfaction, consumer confidence, and life quality
satisfaction.
Using this unique analytical model, we
can probe behind the percentages which are the end products of most analyses and provide
even further insights into the core satisfaction of the respondents to offer
a more complete, accurate and pinpointed look at each satisfaction component.
PerceptiMetrics ® — Turning perceptions into numbers |
1.
Applications |
Attitudes-Affect |
Concept Testing |
Brand Image and Advertising Assessment |
Life Quality |
Customer Satisfaction |
Opinion Polling |
Health-Care Satisfaction |
Mystery Shopping |
Expectations-Experience |
|
2. Item
specific cut-points on the satisfaction scale |
Table 1. Real,
true-to-life rating scores |
|
Q1. Patient's satisfaction with speed of emergency
room service |
| |
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
|
| |
Very
Dissatisfied |
Dissatisfied |
Neutral |
Satisfied |
Very
Satisfied |
Mean Rating
(Interval) |
| |

|
| |
Very
Dissatisfied |
Dissatisfied |
Neutral |
Satisfied |
Very
Dissatisfied |
 |

|
Listen |
|
|
|
|
Never,
Sometimes |

|
Usually |

|
Always |
 |
No |

|
Yes
|
Encourage |
Figure 1. Commensuration
of items listened carefully and encouraged
exercise on a
satisfaction scale. |
Table 2.
Commensurable HMO Scores |
|
Q1. Patient's satisfaction with speed of emergency
room service |
| |
Department Listened Carefully |
|
Encouraged Exercise |
| |
Never,
Sometimes |
Usually |
Always |
Percepti-
Metrics¨ |
No |
Yes |
Percepti-
Metrics¨ |
| HMO A |
10 |
20 |
70 |
|
1.53 |
40 |
60 |
.41 |
| HMO H |
20 |
20 |
60 |
|
.90 |
30 |
70 |
.85 |
| HMO P |
40 |
40 |
20 |
|
.49 |
80 |
20 |
-1.39 |
| HMO U |
50 |
20 |
30 |
|
.43 |
70 |
30 |
- .85 |
| Note. By conventional methods the never,
sometimes/usually/always and no/yes percentages are not comparable. |
| By PerceptiMetrics¨ they are. |
| |
P |
U |
PU |
|
|
HH |
A |
| _____________________________________ |
0 |
_____________________________________ |
Satisfaction |
Figure 2. Satisfaction
gaps between listened carefully and encouraged
exercise for four HMOs. |
F |
| |
3.
Protecting the Data Collection Investment |
Asking better
questions |
Statistically
optimal scores |
More informed data
analysis |
Invariant scores |
More actionable
results |
Secondary analysis
of archival data |
Monitoring change
with longitudinal panels
and fresh samples |
Better output in
subsequent procedures i.e. regression
and anova |
Handling correlated
ordinal data |
|
|
OTHER STATISTICAL ANALYSES BENEFITING FROM THE INPUT OF PerceptiMetrics¨ |
Satisfaction as an
independent
variable affecting, say, patient
volume |
Satisfaction's
association with,
say, hospital image
|
Satisfaction as a
dependent variable,
effected by, say, doctor's hours |
| REGRESSION |
CORRELATION |
REGRESSION |
| ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE |
TIMES SERIES |
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE |
| FORECASTING |
FACTOR ANALYSIS |
CONJOINT ANALYSIS |
| |
| Click
to view* PerceptiMetricsSM - REPORT ITEM, COMPOSITE AND OVERALL
SATISFACTION OF SUB GROUPS COMPARED ON A SINGLE SATISFACTION SCALE
*View with Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Free downloadable from the Adobe site. Click here to  |
Dr. Gordon G. Bechtel,
a Senior Research Scientist, is the creator and modeler
of PerceptiMetrics¨. Dr. Bechtel is an internationally experienced
mathematical psychologist whose desire has always been to build a superior, ultra-precise
and more true-to-life measurement tool for customer/audience satisfaction, consumer
confidence and life quality. Dr. Elaine-Lyons has worked closely with Dr.
Bechtel on the successful development, programming and implementation of PerceptiMetrics¨.
PerceptiMetrics¨ offers a measurement which transcends basic
statistical demographics and psychometrics for a sharper, closer-to-reality examination of
results for consumer satisfaction and life quality studies.